<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1667 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775599</link>
    <description>Section 50C cannot be invoked to treat investment in immovable property as unexplained, because the deeming fiction applies only to transfer of land or building for determining consideration. Where the addition under section 144 rested solely on this inapplicable provision, the foundation for the addition failed and could not be sustained. The impugned addition was deleted, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1667 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775599</link>
      <description>Section 50C cannot be invoked to treat investment in immovable property as unexplained, because the deeming fiction applies only to transfer of land or building for determining consideration. Where the addition under section 144 rested solely on this inapplicable provision, the foundation for the addition failed and could not be sustained. The impugned addition was deleted, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>