<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1670 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775602</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune upheld the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) for delayed payment of employees&#039; contributions to Provident Fund and ESIC, as reflected in the audit report. The tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, which relied on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1670 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775602</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune upheld the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) for delayed payment of employees&#039; contributions to Provident Fund and ESIC, as reflected in the audit report. The tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, which relied on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>