<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1673 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775605</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad held that profits from a slump sale of a business unit, including land classified as a long-term capital asset, qualify for deduction under Section 54EC. The tribunal disagreed with the Pr. CIT&#039;s view that the entire business undertaking should be treated as a single asset excluding individual assets for Section 54EC purposes. Since the sale included land with a specified book value, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under Section 54EC against the capital gains attributable to that land. The ITAT restored the AO&#039;s order allowing the deduction of Rs. 50 lakhs and set aside the Pr. CIT&#039;s order which had disallowed the claim, affirming that the deduction was rightly claimed and the AO&#039;s assessment was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1673 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775605</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad held that profits from a slump sale of a business unit, including land classified as a long-term capital asset, qualify for deduction under Section 54EC. The tribunal disagreed with the Pr. CIT&#039;s view that the entire business undertaking should be treated as a single asset excluding individual assets for Section 54EC purposes. Since the sale included land with a specified book value, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under Section 54EC against the capital gains attributable to that land. The ITAT restored the AO&#039;s order allowing the deduction of Rs. 50 lakhs and set aside the Pr. CIT&#039;s order which had disallowed the claim, affirming that the deduction was rightly claimed and the AO&#039;s assessment was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>