<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1679 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775611</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi - AT held that the addition of unaccounted income based on seized documents was justified as the assessee failed to provide credible evidence explaining the nature and source of the unexplained receipts. The appellant&#039;s claim that interest paid was a revenue expenditure linked to the additional business income was rejected since the director admitted the transactions were unexplained business receipts and included notional interest. Consequently, the interest paid/payable was to be ignored. However, the addition of Rs. 1,18,00,755/- made by the AO was found unsustainable and was deleted. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1679 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775611</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi - AT held that the addition of unaccounted income based on seized documents was justified as the assessee failed to provide credible evidence explaining the nature and source of the unexplained receipts. The appellant&#039;s claim that interest paid was a revenue expenditure linked to the additional business income was rejected since the director admitted the transactions were unexplained business receipts and included notional interest. Consequently, the interest paid/payable was to be ignored. However, the addition of Rs. 1,18,00,755/- made by the AO was found unsustainable and was deleted. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>