<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1683 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775615</link>
    <description>Uncorroborated loose papers and a WhatsApp-extracted Excel sheet were treated as insufficient to sustain additions for unexplained money and expenditure where the assessee produced sale agreements, cancellation deed, ledger extracts and banking records contradicting the alleged on-money and brokerage figures. The material from the search was not independently verified, and the device user denied knowledge of the document and explained the cash references as token amounts. On the same evidentiary deficiency, search-related action under section 153C also failed because untested third-party entries without supporting inquiry or corroboration could not provide a valid jurisdictional basis. The additions were deleted and the assessment action was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=839049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1683 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775615</link>
      <description>Uncorroborated loose papers and a WhatsApp-extracted Excel sheet were treated as insufficient to sustain additions for unexplained money and expenditure where the assessee produced sale agreements, cancellation deed, ledger extracts and banking records contradicting the alleged on-money and brokerage figures. The material from the search was not independently verified, and the device user denied knowledge of the document and explained the cash references as token amounts. On the same evidentiary deficiency, search-related action under section 153C also failed because untested third-party entries without supporting inquiry or corroboration could not provide a valid jurisdictional basis. The additions were deleted and the assessment action was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>