https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45374 The Court upheld the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to the petitioner's failure to comply with pre-deposit conditions under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Despite the petitioner's arguments of financial hardship and unjustified demand, the Court found the Tribunal's decision in line with the law. The Court noted that the Tribunal's order became conclusive after dismissal of a related writ petition, compelling the petitioner to adhere to the deposit requirements. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, citing no grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and awarded costs to the respondents. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:00:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45374 The Court upheld the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to the petitioner's failure to comply with pre-deposit conditions under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Despite the petitioner's arguments of financial hardship and unjustified demand, the Court found the Tribunal's decision in line with the law. The Court noted that the Tribunal's order became conclusive after dismissal of a related writ petition, compelling the petitioner to adhere to the deposit requirements. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, citing no grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and awarded costs to the respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45374