<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1605 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462952</link>
    <description>The ITAT Nagpur held that penalty under section 271D cannot be imposed without prior assessment proceedings. Following precedents from ITAT Indore and Ahmedabad Benches, the Tribunal ruled that initiation of penalty under section 271D/271E requires pending assessment or proceedings arising from an assessment order. Since no such assessment existed, the ex-parte penalty order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 21:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1605 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462952</link>
      <description>The ITAT Nagpur held that penalty under section 271D cannot be imposed without prior assessment proceedings. Following precedents from ITAT Indore and Ahmedabad Benches, the Tribunal ruled that initiation of penalty under section 271D/271E requires pending assessment or proceedings arising from an assessment order. Since no such assessment existed, the ex-parte penalty order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>