<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45367</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious appellate remedy is available, the writ court may decline final interference and leave the parties to agitate their substantive objections before the appellate authority. The text notes the contention that immunity obtained by the principal noticee under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, together with the departmental circular binding the Department, could bar proceedings against subsidiary noticees. It also records that those points were capable of effective consideration in appeal, where appropriate relief could be granted if justified. The writ petition was therefore kept pending on record while the statutory appeal proceeded in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45367</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious appellate remedy is available, the writ court may decline final interference and leave the parties to agitate their substantive objections before the appellate authority. The text notes the contention that immunity obtained by the principal noticee under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, together with the departmental circular binding the Department, could bar proceedings against subsidiary noticees. It also records that those points were capable of effective consideration in appeal, where appropriate relief could be granted if justified. The writ petition was therefore kept pending on record while the statutory appeal proceeded in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>