<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1297 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462956</link>
    <description>The transfer pricing framework requires the Transfer Pricing Officer to record cogent reasons before rejecting an assessee&#039;s substantiated Most Appropriate Method. Where the assessee supports the Internal Cost Plus Method in its transfer pricing study, the officer cannot discard it and substitute the External Transaction Net Margin Method on an arbitrary or irrational basis. The High Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s view and no substantial question of law arose from its order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 21:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1297 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462956</link>
      <description>The transfer pricing framework requires the Transfer Pricing Officer to record cogent reasons before rejecting an assessee&#039;s substantiated Most Appropriate Method. Where the assessee supports the Internal Cost Plus Method in its transfer pricing study, the officer cannot discard it and substitute the External Transaction Net Margin Method on an arbitrary or irrational basis. The High Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s view and no substantial question of law arose from its order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>