<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45364</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act must be fixed by balancing the assessee&#039;s financial position against the prima facie strength of the appeal, and an excessive deposit may be reduced to secure a fair hearing. The Calcutta High Court treated the Tribunal&#039;s original condition as too onerous and substituted it with a reduced deposit of Rs. 11,50,000 to be made within four weeks, after which the appeal would proceed. The discussion also noted, prima facie, that piercing the corporate veil may not readily apply in excise matters where the entities retain separate legal status for other fiscal authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:27:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45364</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act must be fixed by balancing the assessee&#039;s financial position against the prima facie strength of the appeal, and an excessive deposit may be reduced to secure a fair hearing. The Calcutta High Court treated the Tribunal&#039;s original condition as too onerous and substituted it with a reduced deposit of Rs. 11,50,000 to be made within four weeks, after which the appeal would proceed. The discussion also noted, prima facie, that piercing the corporate veil may not readily apply in excise matters where the entities retain separate legal status for other fiscal authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>