<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC allows complaint amendment under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before trial ends if no prejudice to accused</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90930</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order that had disallowed the amendment of a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. post-cognizance. The Court held that the criminal court possesses the power to permit amendments addressing curable infirmities in a complaint, provided no prejudice is caused to the accused. Here, the amendment corrected an inadvertent error concerning the product description without altering the complaint&#039;s nature or character. Since the amendment occurred before the trial&#039;s conclusion and did not prejudice the respondents, the Trial Court rightly allowed it. The High Court erred by considering extraneous issues like GST leviability, which fall outside the criminal trial&#039;s scope. The final determinatio.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC allows complaint amendment under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before trial ends if no prejudice to accused</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90930</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order that had disallowed the amendment of a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. post-cognizance. The Court held that the criminal court possesses the power to permit amendments addressing curable infirmities in a complaint, provided no prejudice is caused to the accused. Here, the amendment corrected an inadvertent error concerning the product description without altering the complaint&#039;s nature or character. Since the amendment occurred before the trial&#039;s conclusion and did not prejudice the respondents, the Trial Court rightly allowed it. The High Court erred by considering extraneous issues like GST leviability, which fall outside the criminal trial&#039;s scope. The final determinatio.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>