https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45355 Where no specific period is prescribed for re-presentation of an appeal, it must still be made within a reasonable time, assessed by the time available for filing, the nature of the defect to be cured, and the explanation for delay. A re-presentation after about nine months for a defect limited to want of verification was held unreasonable because the explanation of the consultant's illness was unsupported by medical or documentary material. On those facts, the Tribunal's refusal to condone the delay disclosed no error of law, and the writ challenge failed. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:44:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45355 Where no specific period is prescribed for re-presentation of an appeal, it must still be made within a reasonable time, assessed by the time available for filing, the nature of the defect to be cured, and the explanation for delay. A re-presentation after about nine months for a defect limited to want of verification was held unreasonable because the explanation of the consultant's illness was unsupported by medical or documentary material. On those facts, the Tribunal's refusal to condone the delay disclosed no error of law, and the writ challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45355