<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1545 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775477</link>
    <description>For the pre-01.04.2011 regime, input services used in relation to setting up or constructing premises for providing taxable output services fell within the inclusive definition of &quot;input service&quot; under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Credit on services such as architects, banking, business support, chartered accountant, commercial or industrial construction, design, insurance, management consultancy and real estate agent services was therefore admissible. The denial of CENVAT credit was unsustainable, especially since the issue had already been covered in the appellant&#039;s own earlier case and affirmed in departmental challenge before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1545 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775477</link>
      <description>For the pre-01.04.2011 regime, input services used in relation to setting up or constructing premises for providing taxable output services fell within the inclusive definition of &quot;input service&quot; under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Credit on services such as architects, banking, business support, chartered accountant, commercial or industrial construction, design, insurance, management consultancy and real estate agent services was therefore admissible. The denial of CENVAT credit was unsustainable, especially since the issue had already been covered in the appellant&#039;s own earlier case and affirmed in departmental challenge before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>