<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1553 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775485</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Kolkata held that penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be imposed without confiscation of goods under Section 113. Since the export goods were not confiscated, the penalty was not leviable. The Tribunal noted no evidence implicating the appellant in mis-declaration or overvaluation of the diamonds. Following precedent, the penalty of Rs.4,50,000 imposed under Section 114 was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1553 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775485</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Kolkata held that penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be imposed without confiscation of goods under Section 113. Since the export goods were not confiscated, the penalty was not leviable. The Tribunal noted no evidence implicating the appellant in mis-declaration or overvaluation of the diamonds. Following precedent, the penalty of Rs.4,50,000 imposed under Section 114 was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>