<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775489</link>
    <description>The HC held that the petition challenging the Principal Commissioner&#039;s refusal to follow the Advance Ruling Authority&#039;s decision was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. The petitioner was issued a show cause notice and heard before the impugned order, and any grievance regarding non-consideration of relevant material should be addressed on appeal. Sections 129A and 129B of the Customs Act confer broad powers on the Appellate Tribunal to confirm, modify, annul, or remit orders for fresh adjudication. Given the efficacy of this remedy, the court declined to entertain the petition and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775489</link>
      <description>The HC held that the petition challenging the Principal Commissioner&#039;s refusal to follow the Advance Ruling Authority&#039;s decision was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. The petitioner was issued a show cause notice and heard before the impugned order, and any grievance regarding non-consideration of relevant material should be addressed on appeal. Sections 129A and 129B of the Customs Act confer broad powers on the Appellate Tribunal to confirm, modify, annul, or remit orders for fresh adjudication. Given the efficacy of this remedy, the court declined to entertain the petition and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>