https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775542 The HC held that the petition challenging the reversal of ineligible ITC on grounds of fraudulent availment was not maintainable as the order was appealable. The petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority. The Court emphasized that factual issues related to fraudulent ITC claims cannot be adjudicated under writ jurisdiction. Since an appeal against the impugned order was already filed and the ITC reversed, the petitioner was allowed to file a fresh appeal manually within one month with a waiver application for pre-deposit. The Court ruled that such appeal would not be dismissed on limitation grounds and must be decided on merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775542 The HC held that the petition challenging the reversal of ineligible ITC on grounds of fraudulent availment was not maintainable as the order was appealable. The petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority. The Court emphasized that factual issues related to fraudulent ITC claims cannot be adjudicated under writ jurisdiction. Since an appeal against the impugned order was already filed and the ITC reversed, the petitioner was allowed to file a fresh appeal manually within one month with a waiver application for pre-deposit. The Court ruled that such appeal would not be dismissed on limitation grounds and must be decided on merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775542