https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775545 The HC held that the petitioner must pursue the appellate remedy against the impugned order involving fraudulent ITC availment through non-existent firms. Typographical errors in the DRC-07 do not justify entertaining a writ petition. The petitioner was directed to rectify the DRC-07 within one week and file the appeal with pre-deposit within 30 days thereafter. Despite the limitation period having expired, the appeal will be heard on merits if filed within this extended timeframe. The appeal must specify the financial year 2018-19. The petition was disposed accordingly. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:39:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775545 The HC held that the petitioner must pursue the appellate remedy against the impugned order involving fraudulent ITC availment through non-existent firms. Typographical errors in the DRC-07 do not justify entertaining a writ petition. The petitioner was directed to rectify the DRC-07 within one week and file the appeal with pre-deposit within 30 days thereafter. Despite the limitation period having expired, the appeal will be heard on merits if filed within this extended timeframe. The appeal must specify the financial year 2018-19. The petition was disposed accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775545