<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 2018 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462936</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision rejecting the AO&#039;s action of disallowing the books of accounts and estimating income under section 44BBB(1), ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed that transactions between the foreign head office and its Indian project office constitute international transactions subject to transfer pricing provisions. It held that the CUP method, not TNMM, is appropriate for determining the arm&#039;s length price, and applying CUP resulted in no transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal also remanded the issue of whether the AO referred the matter to the TPO for determination of ALP back to the AO for verification, allowing this issue for statistical purposes. Overall, the appeal succeeded on substantive grounds except for the procedural matter sent back for further inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 2018 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462936</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision rejecting the AO&#039;s action of disallowing the books of accounts and estimating income under section 44BBB(1), ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed that transactions between the foreign head office and its Indian project office constitute international transactions subject to transfer pricing provisions. It held that the CUP method, not TNMM, is appropriate for determining the arm&#039;s length price, and applying CUP resulted in no transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal also remanded the issue of whether the AO referred the matter to the TPO for determination of ALP back to the AO for verification, allowing this issue for statistical purposes. Overall, the appeal succeeded on substantive grounds except for the procedural matter sent back for further inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>