https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=50516 The Kerala government sought to challenge its Governor's prolonged reservation and delay in granting assent to assembly-passed bills; the Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of those pleas after a related judgment imposed a procedural timeframe for presidential consideration of reserved bills. The Attorney General and Solicitor General opposed withdrawal and urged resolution of constitutional questions via an Article 143 reference. Kerala alleged non-centre-state bills were reserved and left pending for extended periods in breach of the proviso to Article 200, while the Constitution remains silent on any fixed period for presidential assent and Article 361 shields executive actors from judicial answerability. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:16:03 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=50516 The Kerala government sought to challenge its Governor's prolonged reservation and delay in granting assent to assembly-passed bills; the Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of those pleas after a related judgment imposed a procedural timeframe for presidential consideration of reserved bills. The Attorney General and Solicitor General opposed withdrawal and urged resolution of constitutional questions via an Article 143 reference. Kerala alleged non-centre-state bills were reserved and left pending for extended periods in breach of the proviso to Article 200, while the Constitution remains silent on any fixed period for presidential assent and Article 361 shields executive actors from judicial answerability. News - Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:16:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=50516