https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462930 Statutory service rules framed under Article 309 prevailed over earlier executive instructions governing seniority and promotion. The appellants' cadre was placed on a higher revised pay scale and treated as a separate promotional entity, while the respondents remained on a lower scale and were not included in the feeder category for Gazetted Class II posts. On that basis, the earlier executive arrangement could not confer seniority on the respondents or justify their placement above the appellants for promotion. The respondents were therefore not entitled to be treated as senior to the appellants or to secure promotion over them to Gazetted Class II posts. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2025 11:54:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462930 Statutory service rules framed under Article 309 prevailed over earlier executive instructions governing seniority and promotion. The appellants' cadre was placed on a higher revised pay scale and treated as a separate promotional entity, while the respondents remained on a lower scale and were not included in the feeder category for Gazetted Class II posts. On that basis, the earlier executive arrangement could not confer seniority on the respondents or justify their placement above the appellants for promotion. The respondents were therefore not entitled to be treated as senior to the appellants or to secure promotion over them to Gazetted Class II posts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462930