<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45331</link>
    <description>For valuation under the Central Excise law, the dominant issue was whether the cost of galvanisation undertaken after duty payment on M.S. black pipes must be included in the assessable value of galvanised black pipes. The SC held that although galvanisation did not amount to &quot;manufacture&quot;, it enhanced the intrinsic and full commercial value of the goods, reflected in the higher price realised, and the location of the galvanisation process in a different shed was legally irrelevant. Consequently, the assessable value of galvanised black pipes had to include the cost element of galvanisation, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45331</link>
      <description>For valuation under the Central Excise law, the dominant issue was whether the cost of galvanisation undertaken after duty payment on M.S. black pipes must be included in the assessable value of galvanised black pipes. The SC held that although galvanisation did not amount to &quot;manufacture&quot;, it enhanced the intrinsic and full commercial value of the goods, reflected in the higher price realised, and the location of the galvanisation process in a different shed was legally irrelevant. Consequently, the assessable value of galvanised black pipes had to include the cost element of galvanisation, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>