<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1450 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775382</link>
    <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act required the Court to assess whether the petitioner, intercepted while collecting a courier parcel said to contain LSD blots, could be linked to conscious possession on a prima facie basis. Although the quantity exceeded the relevant threshold, the record did not show that the parcel was addressed to the petitioner, no contraband was recovered from his person or premises, and there was no conclusive forensic, financial, or digital evidence connecting him to the alleged trafficking network. The Section 67 disclosure, without independent corroboration, was treated as insufficient at this stage to establish conscious possession, and the twin conditions under Section 37(1)(b) were found satisfied. Bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1450 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775382</link>
      <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act required the Court to assess whether the petitioner, intercepted while collecting a courier parcel said to contain LSD blots, could be linked to conscious possession on a prima facie basis. Although the quantity exceeded the relevant threshold, the record did not show that the parcel was addressed to the petitioner, no contraband was recovered from his person or premises, and there was no conclusive forensic, financial, or digital evidence connecting him to the alleged trafficking network. The Section 67 disclosure, without independent corroboration, was treated as insufficient at this stage to establish conscious possession, and the twin conditions under Section 37(1)(b) were found satisfied. Bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>