<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1451 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775383</link>
    <description>Registered-post service of a tenancy termination notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was upheld because Section 27 of the General Clauses Act raises a presumption of service when the notice is properly addressed, prepaid and sent by registered post. The postal endorsement &quot;ND&quot; did not by itself rebut that presumption, and non-delivery was not treated as defeating deemed service. The Court also noted that revisional interference was unjustified because no limited revisional ground, such as lack of jurisdiction or denial of a proper trial, was shown. The ejectment decree therefore stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1451 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775383</link>
      <description>Registered-post service of a tenancy termination notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was upheld because Section 27 of the General Clauses Act raises a presumption of service when the notice is properly addressed, prepaid and sent by registered post. The postal endorsement &quot;ND&quot; did not by itself rebut that presumption, and non-delivery was not treated as defeating deemed service. The Court also noted that revisional interference was unjustified because no limited revisional ground, such as lack of jurisdiction or denial of a proper trial, was shown. The ejectment decree therefore stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>