https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775383 The SC set aside the HC's order that had nullified the ejectment decree due to non-delivery of notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The Court held that service by registered post, even if marked "Not Delivered," is presumed valid under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act. The HC erred in disregarding this presumption. Consequently, the Trial Court's ejectment decree was restored, and the tenant was directed to vacate the premises within three months. The appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775383 The SC set aside the HC's order that had nullified the ejectment decree due to non-delivery of notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The Court held that service by registered post, even if marked "Not Delivered," is presumed valid under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act. The HC erred in disregarding this presumption. Consequently, the Trial Court's ejectment decree was restored, and the tenant was directed to vacate the premises within three months. The appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775383