<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1461 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775393</link>
    <description>The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision allowing the successful bidder (SAP) additional time beyond the prescribed 90 days to pay the balance sale consideration, citing extraordinary external circumstances and the bidder&#039;s bona fide intent and financial capacity to pay within the original period. The tribunal found no gross irregularity or illegality in the Liquidator&#039;s conduct of the auction, noting the Liquidator&#039;s duty to facilitate the sale and file necessary applications. The SAP paid the balance amount with 12% interest within the extended period, and the proceeds were duly distributed to stakeholders. The appeal challenging the auction&#039;s validity was dismissed, as setting aside the sale would cause unnecessary delay and prejudice to stakeholders without serving justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1461 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775393</link>
      <description>The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision allowing the successful bidder (SAP) additional time beyond the prescribed 90 days to pay the balance sale consideration, citing extraordinary external circumstances and the bidder&#039;s bona fide intent and financial capacity to pay within the original period. The tribunal found no gross irregularity or illegality in the Liquidator&#039;s conduct of the auction, noting the Liquidator&#039;s duty to facilitate the sale and file necessary applications. The SAP paid the balance amount with 12% interest within the extended period, and the proceeds were duly distributed to stakeholders. The appeal challenging the auction&#039;s validity was dismissed, as setting aside the sale would cause unnecessary delay and prejudice to stakeholders without serving justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>