<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1466 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775398</link>
    <description>The SEBI Board found that the Noticee violated regulation 13(a) and 13(b) of the IA Regulations and clauses 1, 5, and 8 of the Code of Conduct by failing to update material information and carrying out unregistered investment advisory activities through two partnership firms. Although the violations related to non-updation were deemed technical and no client complaints were received, the Noticee&#039;s engagement in advisory services prior to registration and continued unregistered activities for over two years were considered serious breaches. The Board rejected the DA&#039;s recommendation against cancellation, viewing the Noticee&#039;s police complaint as a tactic to evade accountability. While mitigating factors such as cessation of activities and refund to clients were noted, the Board held these insufficient to overlook the infractions. Consequently, the Noticee&#039;s registration as an Investment Adviser was suspended for six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1466 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775398</link>
      <description>The SEBI Board found that the Noticee violated regulation 13(a) and 13(b) of the IA Regulations and clauses 1, 5, and 8 of the Code of Conduct by failing to update material information and carrying out unregistered investment advisory activities through two partnership firms. Although the violations related to non-updation were deemed technical and no client complaints were received, the Noticee&#039;s engagement in advisory services prior to registration and continued unregistered activities for over two years were considered serious breaches. The Board rejected the DA&#039;s recommendation against cancellation, viewing the Noticee&#039;s police complaint as a tactic to evade accountability. While mitigating factors such as cessation of activities and refund to clients were noted, the Board held these insufficient to overlook the infractions. Consequently, the Noticee&#039;s registration as an Investment Adviser was suspended for six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>