<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1476 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775408</link>
    <description>The ITAT Rajkot held that the reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as the AO did not make any addition based on the original reason recorded (cash withdrawal) but instead disallowed deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on a different ground without proper authority. The AO&#039;s expansion of jurisdiction without permission was held to be bad in law. Following precedent, the tribunal deleted the addition under section 80P(2)(d) and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:45:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1476 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775408</link>
      <description>The ITAT Rajkot held that the reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as the AO did not make any addition based on the original reason recorded (cash withdrawal) but instead disallowed deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on a different ground without proper authority. The AO&#039;s expansion of jurisdiction without permission was held to be bad in law. Following precedent, the tribunal deleted the addition under section 80P(2)(d) and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>