https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775433 The ITAT Mumbai decided the appeal ex-parte due to the assessee's repeated non-cooperation and failure to appear despite multiple adjournments and opportunities. The appeal concerned reopening of assessment and addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credits linked to bogus purchases reported by the sales tax/VAT department. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had granted partial relief, but the assessee did not provide any evidence or details to support its grounds of appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. en-us Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775433 The ITAT Mumbai decided the appeal ex-parte due to the assessee's repeated non-cooperation and failure to appear despite multiple adjournments and opportunities. The appeal concerned reopening of assessment and addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credits linked to bogus purchases reported by the sales tax/VAT department. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had granted partial relief, but the assessee did not provide any evidence or details to support its grounds of appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775433