<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1515 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775447</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed before expiry of the time granted to file a reply, and without affording a personal hearing, was held to violate procedural fairness and deny a proper opportunity to defend the case. The Madras HC set aside the assessment and consequential summary order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after receipt of the reply, clear notice and a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1515 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775447</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed before expiry of the time granted to file a reply, and without affording a personal hearing, was held to violate procedural fairness and deny a proper opportunity to defend the case. The Madras HC set aside the assessment and consequential summary order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after receipt of the reply, clear notice and a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>