<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1517 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775449</link>
    <description>The applicability of penalty under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act to transactions alleged to have occurred before its commencement remained unresolved at this stage. The Delhi HC noted the challenge to the underlying order and the reliance on a similar decision of another High Court, but did not finally determine the merits. Notice was issued, a counter affidavit was called for, and interim protection against coercive action was granted pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1517 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775449</link>
      <description>The applicability of penalty under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act to transactions alleged to have occurred before its commencement remained unresolved at this stage. The Delhi HC noted the challenge to the underlying order and the reliance on a similar decision of another High Court, but did not finally determine the merits. Notice was issued, a counter affidavit was called for, and interim protection against coercive action was granted pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>