https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462925 The HC held that the Magistrate erred in taking cognizance without affording the accused an opportunity of being heard, as mandated by Section 223 proviso (i) of BNSS. The summoning order dated 28.08.2024 was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the lower court to pass a fresh order in accordance with law expeditiously. The application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:28:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462925 The HC held that the Magistrate erred in taking cognizance without affording the accused an opportunity of being heard, as mandated by Section 223 proviso (i) of BNSS. The summoning order dated 28.08.2024 was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the lower court to pass a fresh order in accordance with law expeditiously. The application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462925