<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1417 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462905</link>
    <description>The HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law regarding the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, specifically addressing whether there was suppression of facts by the respondent. The matter was directed to be heard alongside Central Excise Appeal No.31 of 2014 and connected appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 18:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1417 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462905</link>
      <description>The HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law regarding the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, specifically addressing whether there was suppression of facts by the respondent. The matter was directed to be heard alongside Central Excise Appeal No.31 of 2014 and connected appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>