<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1406 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775338</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that CENVAT credit on service tax paid for job work services is admissible as these services relate directly to the manufacture of final products, consistent with prior rulings. However, credit on services related to statutory compliance such as PF, ESI, and license renewals was denied by lower authorities as these were for employee welfare and not eligible input services. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and disposed of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1406 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775338</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that CENVAT credit on service tax paid for job work services is admissible as these services relate directly to the manufacture of final products, consistent with prior rulings. However, credit on services related to statutory compliance such as PF, ESI, and license renewals was denied by lower authorities as these were for employee welfare and not eligible input services. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and disposed of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>