<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1408 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775340</link>
    <description>The CESTAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding denial of CENVAT credit. The credit was claimed for raw materials allegedly supplied by a vendor whose registration was cancelled after the transactions. The Department failed to provide evidence that the appellant did not receive or account for the goods. No investigation was conducted at the appellant&#039;s premises, the supplier, or transporter, nor was cross-examination of the dealer allowed. Due to this lack of inquiry and evidence, the denial of CENVAT credit was held unjustified. The appeal by Revenue was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1408 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775340</link>
      <description>The CESTAT upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding denial of CENVAT credit. The credit was claimed for raw materials allegedly supplied by a vendor whose registration was cancelled after the transactions. The Department failed to provide evidence that the appellant did not receive or account for the goods. No investigation was conducted at the appellant&#039;s premises, the supplier, or transporter, nor was cross-examination of the dealer allowed. Due to this lack of inquiry and evidence, the denial of CENVAT credit was held unjustified. The appeal by Revenue was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>