<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1418 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775350</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal of the assessee society against the rejection of registration u/s 80G. The CIT(Exemption) had denied registration on the ground of no substantial charitable activity and procedural non-compliance in filing Form 10AB instead of Form 10A. The tribunal found that the assessee had demonstrated activities aligned with its charitable objects and there was no evidence of non-charitable activities or violation of section 2(15). The procedural irregularity of using the wrong form was held insufficient to reject the application, especially for an existing registered entity. The order of the CIT(Exemption) was found non-speaking and lacking proper consideration of facts. The matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration of the registration application. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1418 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775350</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal of the assessee society against the rejection of registration u/s 80G. The CIT(Exemption) had denied registration on the ground of no substantial charitable activity and procedural non-compliance in filing Form 10AB instead of Form 10A. The tribunal found that the assessee had demonstrated activities aligned with its charitable objects and there was no evidence of non-charitable activities or violation of section 2(15). The procedural irregularity of using the wrong form was held insufficient to reject the application, especially for an existing registered entity. The order of the CIT(Exemption) was found non-speaking and lacking proper consideration of facts. The matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration of the registration application. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>