<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1431 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775363</link>
    <description>The ITAT RAIPUR held that the notice under section 142(1) was not validly issued or served to the assessee as it lacked essential details and was not transmitted in the prescribed mode under section 144B(6)(ii)(a). Consequently, the assessment order based on such defective notice was declared arbitrary, bad in law, and void ab initio. The assessment was quashed, rendering all subsequent proceedings non-est in the eyes of law. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1431 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775363</link>
      <description>The ITAT RAIPUR held that the notice under section 142(1) was not validly issued or served to the assessee as it lacked essential details and was not transmitted in the prescribed mode under section 144B(6)(ii)(a). Consequently, the assessment order based on such defective notice was declared arbitrary, bad in law, and void ab initio. The assessment was quashed, rendering all subsequent proceedings non-est in the eyes of law. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>