<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1438 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775370</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad set aside the rejection of registration under section 80G(5) granted to a charitable trust with religious objects, noting that the trust&#039;s overall objectives included both religious and charitable activities. The tribunal found that the CIT(E) incorrectly concluded that the trust exceeded the 5% limit on religious expenditure for FY 2023-24, as evidence showed only FY 2021-22 expenses exceeded this limit. The limited time given to the trust to respond was also deemed insufficient. The matter was remanded to the CIT(E) to provide the trust another opportunity to explain its religious expenses for the relevant years. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1438 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775370</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad set aside the rejection of registration under section 80G(5) granted to a charitable trust with religious objects, noting that the trust&#039;s overall objectives included both religious and charitable activities. The tribunal found that the CIT(E) incorrectly concluded that the trust exceeded the 5% limit on religious expenditure for FY 2023-24, as evidence showed only FY 2021-22 expenses exceeded this limit. The limited time given to the trust to respond was also deemed insufficient. The matter was remanded to the CIT(E) to provide the trust another opportunity to explain its religious expenses for the relevant years. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>