https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775380 Anticipatory bail was considered appropriate because the investigation was complete, the prosecution report had been filed, and cognizance had been taken. The court noted that the petitioner had not been arrested during investigation, no warrant of arrest had been sought, and there was no material showing any likelihood of custodial interrogation or tampering with evidence. As the alleged evidence was documentary and already in the prosecution's possession, custodial interrogation was found unnecessary. Anticipatory bail was therefore granted, subject to surrender and release on the specified terms and conditions. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775380 Anticipatory bail was considered appropriate because the investigation was complete, the prosecution report had been filed, and cognizance had been taken. The court noted that the petitioner had not been arrested during investigation, no warrant of arrest had been sought, and there was no material showing any likelihood of custodial interrogation or tampering with evidence. As the alleged evidence was documentary and already in the prosecution's possession, custodial interrogation was found unnecessary. Anticipatory bail was therefore granted, subject to surrender and release on the specified terms and conditions. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775380