<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 95 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45291</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras allowed the writ petitions, remanding the matter back to the second respondent for a fresh decision. The Court directed the consideration of the Bill of Lading date and the public notice date in determining the validity of the import clearance under OGL. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles by providing relevant reports to the concerned parties for a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 95 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45291</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras allowed the writ petitions, remanding the matter back to the second respondent for a fresh decision. The Court directed the consideration of the Bill of Lading date and the public notice date in determining the validity of the import clearance under OGL. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles by providing relevant reports to the concerned parties for a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>