<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Don&#039;t file litigation after reading newspapers: Delhi HC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=50275</link>
    <description>The court dismissed a PIL challenging recruitment practices and seeking regulatory probes, finding the petition inadequately pleaded and premised chiefly on newspaper reports; it held that press accounts lack evidentiary value without corroboration, noted an internal inquiry had closed the matter, and directed petitioners to do proper research and, where appropriate, approach regulatory authorities rather than bring lightly founded public interest litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:01:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:01:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Don&#039;t file litigation after reading newspapers: Delhi HC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=50275</link>
      <description>The court dismissed a PIL challenging recruitment practices and seeking regulatory probes, finding the petition inadequately pleaded and premised chiefly on newspaper reports; it held that press accounts lack evidentiary value without corroboration, noted an internal inquiry had closed the matter, and directed petitioners to do proper research and, where appropriate, approach regulatory authorities rather than bring lightly founded public interest litigation.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:01:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=50275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>