https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90806 The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order dated 28.02.2024, which had confirmed adjudged demands under the extended limitation period, imposed confiscation, redemption fine, and penalties on the appellants. The Tribunal held that the exemption notifications issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, granting duty exemption on specified knee and hip implants, are general exemptions applicable without additional conditions such as use by disabled persons. The impugned goods fall within the scope of the exemption as per the description in List-30 and related notifications, covering orthopedic appliances and implants. The classification and interpretation of the exemption were found consistent with the statutory ..... en-us Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:42 +0530 Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90806 The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order dated 28.02.2024, which had confirmed adjudged demands under the extended limitation period, imposed confiscation, redemption fine, and penalties on the appellants. The Tribunal held that the exemption notifications issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, granting duty exemption on specified knee and hip implants, are general exemptions applicable without additional conditions such as use by disabled persons. The impugned goods fall within the scope of the exemption as per the description in List-30 and related notifications, covering orthopedic appliances and implants. The classification and interpretation of the exemption were found consistent with the statutory ..... Highlights Customs Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:42 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90806