<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustment on AMP Expenses Under Section 92B, Upholds Arm&#039;s Length Remuneration</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90801</link>
    <description>The ITAT deleted the Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to AMP expenses incurred by the appellant as an international transaction under section 92B. The tribunal relied on its coordinate bench&#039;s precedent, holding that since the appellant demonstrated arm&#039;s length remuneration from distribution services, including subvention income exceeding the adjustment amount, no further addition was justified. The TPO&#039;s reliance on the Bright Line Test was rejected as lacking statutory basis. Consequently, the impugned Transfer Pricing adjustment was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal on this ground was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustment on AMP Expenses Under Section 92B, Upholds Arm&#039;s Length Remuneration</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90801</link>
      <description>The ITAT deleted the Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to AMP expenses incurred by the appellant as an international transaction under section 92B. The tribunal relied on its coordinate bench&#039;s precedent, holding that since the appellant demonstrated arm&#039;s length remuneration from distribution services, including subvention income exceeding the adjustment amount, no further addition was justified. The TPO&#039;s reliance on the Bright Line Test was rejected as lacking statutory basis. Consequently, the impugned Transfer Pricing adjustment was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal on this ground was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>