<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Recall application dismissed in winding up; no trial for specific performance under Companies Act 2013 and CPC Order IX Rule 9</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90783</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the recall application challenging the disclaimer order passed in winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 2013. The court held that the Company Court&#039;s powers are limited and do not extend to granting specific performance without a trial, especially where limitation has expired and no suit was filed. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was inapplicable due to lack of a subsisting enforceable contract and prior possession under a lease/license. The applicant, lacking locus standi as a contributory with no further interest, was barred by Order IX Rule 9 CPC from re-agitating dismissed claims. No material fact was suppressed to justify recall, and no jurisdictional error or ground for review was shown. The orde.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Recall application dismissed in winding up; no trial for specific performance under Companies Act 2013 and CPC Order IX Rule 9</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90783</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the recall application challenging the disclaimer order passed in winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 2013. The court held that the Company Court&#039;s powers are limited and do not extend to granting specific performance without a trial, especially where limitation has expired and no suit was filed. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was inapplicable due to lack of a subsisting enforceable contract and prior possession under a lease/license. The applicant, lacking locus standi as a contributory with no further interest, was barred by Order IX Rule 9 CPC from re-agitating dismissed claims. No material fact was suppressed to justify recall, and no jurisdictional error or ground for review was shown. The orde.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>