<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1330 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775262</link>
    <description>Fraudulent use of a person&#039;s Aadhaar and PAN to obtain bank and GST registrations requires prompt action by the bank and authorities, including criminal reporting and regulatory response; prolonged inaction and failure to initiate an FIR were treated as a dereliction. GST attachment and related recovery based on the impersonator&#039;s transactions could not be sustained against the innocent person once the fraud was brought to notice. To prevent continuing prejudice, the court directed deletion of the petitioner&#039;s Aadhaar and PAN details from the GST portal, restrained further proceedings tied to the impersonator&#039;s acts, imposed costs on the authorities, and left the petitioner to seek a fresh PAN-related remedy before income tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1330 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775262</link>
      <description>Fraudulent use of a person&#039;s Aadhaar and PAN to obtain bank and GST registrations requires prompt action by the bank and authorities, including criminal reporting and regulatory response; prolonged inaction and failure to initiate an FIR were treated as a dereliction. GST attachment and related recovery based on the impersonator&#039;s transactions could not be sustained against the innocent person once the fraud was brought to notice. To prevent continuing prejudice, the court directed deletion of the petitioner&#039;s Aadhaar and PAN details from the GST portal, restrained further proceedings tied to the impersonator&#039;s acts, imposed costs on the authorities, and left the petitioner to seek a fresh PAN-related remedy before income tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>