<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1331 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775263</link>
    <description>Note 3 of Regulation 55 of the CERC Tariff Regulations, 2019 operates only for tariff computation and billing: free energy to the home State is taken as 13% or actuals, whichever is less, for fixing saleable capacity and recoverable pass-through, but it does not prohibit actual contractual supply of free power above 13% or extinguish a prior Implementation Agreement. The regulatory cap limits tariff recovery alone, while the contractual free power obligation remains intact. The Electricity Act framework also places interpretation of tariff regulations and related contractual consequences within the specialised regulatory regime, so a writ petition seeking realignment of the Implementation Agreement on that basis was not maintainable before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1331 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775263</link>
      <description>Note 3 of Regulation 55 of the CERC Tariff Regulations, 2019 operates only for tariff computation and billing: free energy to the home State is taken as 13% or actuals, whichever is less, for fixing saleable capacity and recoverable pass-through, but it does not prohibit actual contractual supply of free power above 13% or extinguish a prior Implementation Agreement. The regulatory cap limits tariff recovery alone, while the contractual free power obligation remains intact. The Electricity Act framework also places interpretation of tariff regulations and related contractual consequences within the specialised regulatory regime, so a writ petition seeking realignment of the Implementation Agreement on that basis was not maintainable before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>