<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1335 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775267</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was confined to services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture, including services within the inclusive limb, unless specifically excluded. Credit was also recognised as inconsistent with the department&#039;s contrary stand where substantially similar services had already been accepted for a subsequent period. However, air travel agent, foreign exchange, health service and outdoor catering services fell within the exclusion for personal use or consumption, so credit was denied on those items. The result was allowance of credit on eligible input services and disallowance only for the excluded services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1335 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775267</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was confined to services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture, including services within the inclusive limb, unless specifically excluded. Credit was also recognised as inconsistent with the department&#039;s contrary stand where substantially similar services had already been accepted for a subsequent period. However, air travel agent, foreign exchange, health service and outdoor catering services fell within the exclusion for personal use or consumption, so credit was denied on those items. The result was allowance of credit on eligible input services and disallowance only for the excluded services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>