https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775269 The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the demand for service tax recovery for the extended period is not sustainable, aligning with precedent decisions. However, the demand for the normal period was upheld. Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside. The appeal was allowed in part. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775269 The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the demand for service tax recovery for the extended period is not sustainable, aligning with precedent decisions. However, the demand for the normal period was upheld. Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside. The appeal was allowed in part. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775269