<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1338 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775270</link>
    <description>Service tax demand against a sub-contractor is discussed as unsustainable where the main contractor has already discharged tax on the full composite value of the services. The analysis notes that repeated levy on the same services would result in double taxation, and treats the dispute as revenue neutral because any tax paid by the sub-contractor would be available as credit to the main contractor. On that basis, the demand is stated to fail and consequential relief follows.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1338 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775270</link>
      <description>Service tax demand against a sub-contractor is discussed as unsustainable where the main contractor has already discharged tax on the full composite value of the services. The analysis notes that repeated levy on the same services would result in double taxation, and treats the dispute as revenue neutral because any tax paid by the sub-contractor would be available as credit to the main contractor. On that basis, the demand is stated to fail and consequential relief follows.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>