<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1343 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775275</link>
    <description>Interlocutory relief concerning sale of company assets was refined under injunction principles to balance the plaintiffs&#039; control of the company with protection of the defendants&#039; claimed interest. The court accepted a prima facie concern that sale at circle rate could still involve unaccounted cash payments and prejudice the defendants if they ultimately succeeded. It therefore declined a complete status quo restraint, but modified the consent arrangement so any sale must be at prevailing market value, consideration must pass only through banking channels, and a Local Commissioner-cum-Observer may be appointed to assess market value at the time of sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1343 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775275</link>
      <description>Interlocutory relief concerning sale of company assets was refined under injunction principles to balance the plaintiffs&#039; control of the company with protection of the defendants&#039; claimed interest. The court accepted a prima facie concern that sale at circle rate could still involve unaccounted cash payments and prejudice the defendants if they ultimately succeeded. It therefore declined a complete status quo restraint, but modified the consent arrangement so any sale must be at prevailing market value, consideration must pass only through banking channels, and a Local Commissioner-cum-Observer may be appointed to assess market value at the time of sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>