<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1351 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775283</link>
    <description>Detention of seized gold bars could not be continued where no show cause notice had been issued, and the goods were therefore required to be released. Release was made conditional on payment of customs duty as determined by the Customs Authority. No redemption fine or penalty was leviable, and only 50% of the warehouse charges applicable on the date of detention were payable in view of the delay in adjudication and absence of notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1351 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775283</link>
      <description>Detention of seized gold bars could not be continued where no show cause notice had been issued, and the goods were therefore required to be released. Release was made conditional on payment of customs duty as determined by the Customs Authority. No redemption fine or penalty was leviable, and only 50% of the warehouse charges applicable on the date of detention were payable in view of the delay in adjudication and absence of notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>