<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1361 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775293</link>
    <description>Addition towards investment in immovable property was held unsustainable where the assessee produced evidence showing that the funds came from three related parties through banking channels, and each contributor had filed regular income-tax returns. The supporting documents were placed in the paper book, and no defect in that evidence was recorded. On that basis, the unexplained-investment addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=838001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1361 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775293</link>
      <description>Addition towards investment in immovable property was held unsustainable where the assessee produced evidence showing that the funds came from three related parties through banking channels, and each contributor had filed regular income-tax returns. The supporting documents were placed in the paper book, and no defect in that evidence was recorded. On that basis, the unexplained-investment addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>